Wikicars:Requests for adminship

Administration

---

{{{1}}}

• Current Administrators
• Successful adminship nominations
• Unsuccessful adminship nominations

Nominating

Nominations must be accepted by the user in question. If you wish to nominate a user, contact them first before making the nomination page.

Current Nominations

All Current Nominations requests are being TABLED. Please discuss here.

Invader Car

Support

Oppose

1. Sorry, but I am going to have to oppose this one for now. Right now we have alot of Administrators, but not much to alot to watch over.At the time being we have all the admins we need, as the site grows and we gain more contributors, maybe then you could join our ranks. I am sure you would make a good admin, but at the moment we are full. (Though we might as well count inactive administrators out) Enzo Worshipper ^{(Talk to me + Contribs)} 13:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

1. I'm also going to have to oppose this nomination. We do have plenty of admins for our current community's size, and with less than 100 edits, I don't know that you've been an active enough member for us to see the true quality of your work. Keep it up, though, and we will keep your name in mind the next time we see the need for an admin role to be filled. - Pastrami on Ry 17:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Neutral

1. Not Really Sure-Mugen Power 18:46, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• So it appears Invader Car wants adminship as well. Enzo Worshipper ^{(Talk to me + Contribs)} 13:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Is my nomination ready yet? Invader Car ^{(talk - contribs - Sign here!)} 00:19, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Invader Car, your nomination is currently being tabled - just until we're ready to open up the nomination process, again. This is not to say that you won't have the chance to become an administrator here, later. We just don't have the need for additional administrators, right now. Thanks for checking in, and happy wiki'ing! -Nidhi 12:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Bureaucratic Nominations

All Bureaucratic Nominations requests are being TABLED. Please discuss here.

Enzo Worshipper

Support

1. I'm supporting this. Red marquis 01:58, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

Comments

• I would like to nominate myself to become a bureaucrat. I feel that I am a big part of the site, and at the moment we have only one active bureaucrat. Enzo Worshipper ^{(Talk to me + Contribs)} 14:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

• Whats the difference between a sysop and a Bureaucrat?

Bureaucrats have the power to create sysops and have other different powers. Enzo Worshipper ^{(Talk to me + Contribs)} 15:32, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Red_marquis

Support

1. I support this because Red Marquis has been a huge part of the site with over what, like, 35,000 contributions? So yeah. I support this nomination. Pepperpop11 17:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)

Oppose

Neutral

1. Sorry Red, but after your explosion on Garage Talk, I feel nervous about this one. As far as I know, the minute you get promoted you will strip me of my position, and I don't want to take that risk. Unless you can convince me otherwise, my vote remains neutral. Enzo Worshipper ^{(Talk to me + Contribs)} 20:54, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

Comments

• I would like to nominate myself for this position. I feel that projects I am working on will require that I assume these powers in order to be effective. Red marquis 03:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

• I understand 0-172. That was way too extreme and out-of-line for me to declare and is not even sysop-like behavior. However, far from stripping anyone of powers, all I'm really asking for is a little participation Red marquis 01:15, 6 September 2007 (UTC)