.
Mercury Mariner Hybrid Review: Difference between revisions
m (→Exterior) |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Image:mariner.jpg|right|300px]] | [[Image:mariner.jpg|right|300px]] | ||
The '''[[Mercury]] Mariner''' debuted in late 2004 as a 2005 | The '''[[Mercury]] Mariner''' debuted in late 2004 as a 2005 [[crossover SUV]], essentially a re-skinned Ford Escape with minor enhancements. The Ford Escape was jointly developed with [[Mazda]], in which Ford owns a controlling interest, and was released a few months after the nearly-identical [[Mazda Tribute]]. The Escape is sold in Europe as the [[Ford Maverick]] while the Mariner is not. | ||
It is built on the Ford CD2 platform, which is in turn based on the Mazda GF platform, which was used by the [[Mazda 626]]. | It is built on the Ford CD2 platform, which is in turn based on the Mazda GF platform, which was used by the [[Mazda 626]]. | ||
The [[Mercury]] Mariner is a sport utility vehicle, not a car, so ride quality is not on par with similar sized cars. Still, the Mariner has some of the best ride qualities in its class. | The [[Mercury]] Mariner is a sport utility vehicle, not a car, so ride quality is not on par with similar sized cars. Still, the Mariner has some of the best ride qualities in its class. | ||
The four-speed automatic transmission works well with either engine, admirably holding the better gear for extended periods when stressed by terrain or load. | The four-speed automatic transmission works well with either engine, admirably holding the better gear for extended periods when stressed by terrain or load. It will confidently master snow-filled parking lots at the ski lodge and muddy driveways at the weekend cabin. However, the Mariner is not designed to navigate truly rugged terrain off road. | ||
Braking is responsive and the pedal feel | Braking is responsive and the pedal feel solid. An extra degree of safety is provided by [[electronic brake force distribution]], which the [[Escape]] also offers. Front disc/rear drum brakes come on the Convenience model with its four-cylinder engine. The [[V6]] powered Luxury and Premier models come with four-wheel disc brakes. | ||
At best, the Mariner is only marginally quieter than the Escape, with road noise clearly noticeable. Fit and finish in the cabin was up to par, with no squeaking sounds or rattles heard. | |||
The 3.0-liter [[V6]] engine gives brisk acceleration performance. Buyers will not be looking for more power with this | The 3.0-liter [[V6]] engine gives brisk acceleration performance. Buyers will not be looking for more power with this engine. The four-speed [[automatic transmission]] works well with it. Upshifts and downshifts are quick, fluid and smooth. The transmission always knows the best ratio to utilize. Reviewers don't believe this engine to be the smoothest on the market, but they certainly haven't called it the roughest either. It remains more satisfying than the four-cylinder engines found in most compact sport-utilities. Noise, vibration and harshness go up a level on the 4 cylinder equipped modles. Noise and vibration reduction measures were taken in fitting the engine with a balance shaft, but further efforts should be made in future to further reduce interior noise. This 2.3-liter Duratec 4-cylinder engine is available on Convenience models. The four-wheel drive system is based on a [[front wheel drive]] platform. Any serious gradients will leave this sport utility spinning its wheels. The suspension does not have the articulation needed for real off road conditions. Using this sport utility for everyday road travel, however, would be an excellent choice. | ||
==High Points== | |||
* V6 delivers good power and never seems to struggle | * V6 delivers good power and never seems to struggle | ||
* Bold styling | * Bold styling | ||
* Rides better, out handles most of its competition | * Rides better, out handles most of its competition | ||
==Low Points== | |||
* I4 has anemic performance on highway | * I4 has anemic performance on highway | ||
* [[Jeep Liberty]] is more capable off road. | * [[Jeep Liberty]] is more capable off road. | ||
* Fuel consumption (V6 4WD) | * Fuel consumption (V6 4WD) | ||
==Performance and Handling== | |||
[[Anti-lock brakes (ABS)]] operate smoothly. Pedal response has been praised. Drum brakes are used on the rear except on V6 4WD models and [[Escape Hybrid]], which have with four-wheel disc brakes. [[Brake Assist]] helps handling, allowing full braking power when it senses the driver has mistakenly relaxed pressure on the brake pedal in an emergency stopping situation. In addition, [[electronic brake-force distribution (EBD)]] provides more effective, more stable braking. | [[Anti-lock brakes (ABS)]] operate smoothly. Pedal response has been praised. Drum brakes are used on the rear except on V6 4WD models and [[Escape Hybrid]], which have with four-wheel disc brakes. [[Brake Assist]] helps handling, allowing full braking power when it senses the driver has mistakenly relaxed pressure on the brake pedal in an emergency stopping situation. In addition, [[electronic brake-force distribution (EBD)]] provides more effective, more stable braking. | ||
==Gas Mileage== | |||
<table border=1 bordercolor=#000008> | <table border=1 bordercolor=#000008> | ||
<tr bgcolor=#ccccc> | <tr bgcolor=#ccccc> | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
==Reliability and Maintenance== | |||
==Interior and Comforts== | |||
To a large extent, what holds for the Mercury Mariner's exterior holds for its interior. If you like the Mountaineer's appointments and | To a large extent, what holds for the Mercury Mariner's exterior holds for its interior. If you like the [[Mountaineer]]'s appointments and looks, you'll like the Mariner's. Central in the Mariner's design is satin-finish aluminum, which abounds inside and out. Instrument cluster bezels, center dash stack's vertical braces, shift lever cap, logo in the steering wheel hub, door armrests and so on. About the only interior metal surfaces that aren't satin-finish are the chrome inside door handles and accent ringing the shift lever in the center console. This isn't to complain, as the overall look is one of polish and refinement, which is hindered some by simulated wood trim on the center stack and console. | ||
Front bucket seats are nicely contoured and bolstered. The rear seat, even though a split-to-fold 60/40 unit, is essentially a two-piece bench, is not the most accommodating for long drives. On the plus side, all five seating positions have three-point belts and adjustable head restraints. | |||
That rear seat does fold almost flat, however, making for decent cargo room. Tie-down hooks are provided to secure odd-shaped or especially mobile objects. The rear quarter panel has open storage bins for smaller items. Front seatbacks host map pockets, as do both front doors. The overhead console (which the moonroof displaces) has two swing-down bins. The center console has two cupholders and a shallow bin forward of the shift lever. | |||
Cruise control buttons are smoothly integrated into the sides of the steering wheel hub. Power window buttons, however, are an older design, i.e., non-child/curious pet-proof. The stereo, too, shouts standard Ford gear; as functional and easy-to-use as its controls are, they don't quite make premium grade. | |||
Cruise control buttons are smoothly integrated into the sides of the steering wheel hub. Power window buttons, however, are | |||
===Exterior=== | ===Exterior=== | ||
| Line 126: | Line 122: | ||
Borrowing from Europe, small turn-indicator repeater lights are positioned in the front quarter panels just aft of and slight above the front wheel wells. Understated cladding preserves and protects the lower door panels and tie together the minimalist front and rear fender flares, nicely finishing the mid-door, horizontal character line optically connecting the front and rear bumpers. The tall glasshouse is properly proportioned to balance the body side panels. The angled C-pillar behind the rear side door accentuates the people-orientation of the Mariner while acknowledging it can haul cargo, too. | Borrowing from Europe, small turn-indicator repeater lights are positioned in the front quarter panels just aft of and slight above the front wheel wells. Understated cladding preserves and protects the lower door panels and tie together the minimalist front and rear fender flares, nicely finishing the mid-door, horizontal character line optically connecting the front and rear bumpers. The tall glasshouse is properly proportioned to balance the body side panels. The angled C-pillar behind the rear side door accentuates the people-orientation of the Mariner while acknowledging it can haul cargo, too. | ||
More satin-finish grille-like accents brace the taillamps. The side character line continues across the liftgate, swelling in the center to form a surround for the license plate recess. Another satin-finish inset separates the step-top of the rear bumper and the body-color lower fascia. Bright chrome exhaust tips finish the package | |||
==Styles and Options== | |||
The Escape is available in one 4-door body style. [[Four wheel drive]] is standard. | The Escape is available in one 4-door body style. [[Four wheel drive]] is standard. | ||
==Main Competitors== | |||
* [[Toyota RAV4]] | * [[Toyota RAV4]] | ||
* [[Honda Element]] | * [[Honda Element]] | ||
| Line 137: | Line 133: | ||
* [[Dodge Nitro]] | * [[Dodge Nitro]] | ||
* [[Kia Sportage]] | * [[Kia Sportage]] | ||
* [[Ford Escape]] | |||
==Hybrid== | ==Hybrid== | ||
Revision as of 11:37, 5 July 2006
The Mercury Mariner debuted in late 2004 as a 2005 crossover SUV, essentially a re-skinned Ford Escape with minor enhancements. The Ford Escape was jointly developed with Mazda, in which Ford owns a controlling interest, and was released a few months after the nearly-identical Mazda Tribute. The Escape is sold in Europe as the Ford Maverick while the Mariner is not.
It is built on the Ford CD2 platform, which is in turn based on the Mazda GF platform, which was used by the Mazda 626. The Mercury Mariner is a sport utility vehicle, not a car, so ride quality is not on par with similar sized cars. Still, the Mariner has some of the best ride qualities in its class. The four-speed automatic transmission works well with either engine, admirably holding the better gear for extended periods when stressed by terrain or load. It will confidently master snow-filled parking lots at the ski lodge and muddy driveways at the weekend cabin. However, the Mariner is not designed to navigate truly rugged terrain off road.
Braking is responsive and the pedal feel solid. An extra degree of safety is provided by electronic brake force distribution, which the Escape also offers. Front disc/rear drum brakes come on the Convenience model with its four-cylinder engine. The V6 powered Luxury and Premier models come with four-wheel disc brakes.
At best, the Mariner is only marginally quieter than the Escape, with road noise clearly noticeable. Fit and finish in the cabin was up to par, with no squeaking sounds or rattles heard.
The 3.0-liter V6 engine gives brisk acceleration performance. Buyers will not be looking for more power with this engine. The four-speed automatic transmission works well with it. Upshifts and downshifts are quick, fluid and smooth. The transmission always knows the best ratio to utilize. Reviewers don't believe this engine to be the smoothest on the market, but they certainly haven't called it the roughest either. It remains more satisfying than the four-cylinder engines found in most compact sport-utilities. Noise, vibration and harshness go up a level on the 4 cylinder equipped modles. Noise and vibration reduction measures were taken in fitting the engine with a balance shaft, but further efforts should be made in future to further reduce interior noise. This 2.3-liter Duratec 4-cylinder engine is available on Convenience models. The four-wheel drive system is based on a front wheel drive platform. Any serious gradients will leave this sport utility spinning its wheels. The suspension does not have the articulation needed for real off road conditions. Using this sport utility for everyday road travel, however, would be an excellent choice.
High Points
- V6 delivers good power and never seems to struggle
- Bold styling
- Rides better, out handles most of its competition
Low Points
- I4 has anemic performance on highway
- Jeep Liberty is more capable off road.
- Fuel consumption (V6 4WD)
Performance and Handling
Anti-lock brakes (ABS) operate smoothly. Pedal response has been praised. Drum brakes are used on the rear except on V6 4WD models and Escape Hybrid, which have with four-wheel disc brakes. Brake Assist helps handling, allowing full braking power when it senses the driver has mistakenly relaxed pressure on the brake pedal in an emergency stopping situation. In addition, electronic brake-force distribution (EBD) provides more effective, more stable braking.
Gas Mileage
|
Trim |
|||||
|
FWD 2.3L manual |
FWD 2.3L automatic |
FWD 3.0L |
4WD 2.3L manual |
4WD 2.3L automatic |
4WD 3.0L |
|
Engine |
|||||
|
2.3L I-4 |
2.3L I-4 |
3.0L V6 |
2.3L I-4 |
2.3L I-4 |
3.0L V6 |
|
MPG (City/Highway) |
|||||
|
24/29 |
22/26 |
20/24 |
22/26 |
21/24 |
19/23 |
Reliability and Maintenance
Interior and Comforts
To a large extent, what holds for the Mercury Mariner's exterior holds for its interior. If you like the Mountaineer's appointments and looks, you'll like the Mariner's. Central in the Mariner's design is satin-finish aluminum, which abounds inside and out. Instrument cluster bezels, center dash stack's vertical braces, shift lever cap, logo in the steering wheel hub, door armrests and so on. About the only interior metal surfaces that aren't satin-finish are the chrome inside door handles and accent ringing the shift lever in the center console. This isn't to complain, as the overall look is one of polish and refinement, which is hindered some by simulated wood trim on the center stack and console.
Front bucket seats are nicely contoured and bolstered. The rear seat, even though a split-to-fold 60/40 unit, is essentially a two-piece bench, is not the most accommodating for long drives. On the plus side, all five seating positions have three-point belts and adjustable head restraints.
That rear seat does fold almost flat, however, making for decent cargo room. Tie-down hooks are provided to secure odd-shaped or especially mobile objects. The rear quarter panel has open storage bins for smaller items. Front seatbacks host map pockets, as do both front doors. The overhead console (which the moonroof displaces) has two swing-down bins. The center console has two cupholders and a shallow bin forward of the shift lever.
Cruise control buttons are smoothly integrated into the sides of the steering wheel hub. Power window buttons, however, are an older design, i.e., non-child/curious pet-proof. The stereo, too, shouts standard Ford gear; as functional and easy-to-use as its controls are, they don't quite make premium grade.
Exterior
The trademark satin-finish aluminum vertical-bar grille sits on a matching bumper inset, turn indicator lights are housed where the headlamp lenses wrap around the fenders and the central recess in the hood imbues the front fenders with a subtle shoulder look.
Borrowing from Europe, small turn-indicator repeater lights are positioned in the front quarter panels just aft of and slight above the front wheel wells. Understated cladding preserves and protects the lower door panels and tie together the minimalist front and rear fender flares, nicely finishing the mid-door, horizontal character line optically connecting the front and rear bumpers. The tall glasshouse is properly proportioned to balance the body side panels. The angled C-pillar behind the rear side door accentuates the people-orientation of the Mariner while acknowledging it can haul cargo, too.
More satin-finish grille-like accents brace the taillamps. The side character line continues across the liftgate, swelling in the center to form a surround for the license plate recess. Another satin-finish inset separates the step-top of the rear bumper and the body-color lower fascia. Bright chrome exhaust tips finish the package
Styles and Options
The Escape is available in one 4-door body style. Four wheel drive is standard.
Main Competitors
Hybrid
In 2004, the Ford Escape Hybrid was released. This hybrid electric vehicle is 75% more fuel-efficient than the regular Escape according to Environmental Protection Agency tests and was the first SUV available to the public with hybrid technology.
